I haven't spoken much about the success of my 2012 book The Manosphere: A New Hope For Masculinity. Commercially, it's been moderately positive. Critically, it took an early but well-reasoned hit from Matt Forney, who called it a noble failure. I copped to his legitimate concerns - the book is flawed in execution, I freely admit. Real Soon Now I will be publishing an update or new edition, whenever I find the time. A lot has happened in the Manopshere since that book came out, and it needs to be covered.
But occasionally something comes up that brings me back to that "noble failure", like an Amazon reviewer who appreciated the book in concept and what it was trying to explain. When this review came up on the site I was gratified by the reviewer's insights. It would have made an excellent forward to the book. So I'm going to present it in full, here, because I'm lazy and I think that the observations about the culture he makes are well worth the space to repeat.
(BTW, I'm not doing this to amp up book sales. But I'll see about putting the beast on sale soon, just for giggles.)
4.0 out of 5 stars An illuminating and potentially empowering tour of male subcultures, June 30, 2014
By Ben Hourigan, author "Ben Hourigan" (Melbourne, Australia)
This review is from: The Manosphere: A New Hope For Masculinity (Kindle Edition)
After failing to be interested in it at university, I’ve been discussing gender politics with friends online since early 2013. Check out the “gender” category on my blog (benhourigan.com) for some examples. To sum up, I find much of contemporary ‘feminist’ discourse sexist, poorly reasoned, censorious, and contemptuous of the facts—a discredit to the name and to the people who rally behind it.
When I disagree with a thing, I make sure I do my research, and in the past twelve months I’ve read rather a lot in a feminist vein and in opposition. Ian Ironwood’s The Manosphere! A New Hope for Masculinity falls into the latter category.
Agree with them or not, contrarian thinkers often seem fresher and are more fascinating than adherents to the current orthodoxy. “The manosphere” is an after-the-fact grouping of a range of men’s subcultures, from those of men’s rights activists (MRAs) and pick-up artists (PUAs) to gay men attempting to create a masculine identity amid a culture that expects their feminization. I first came into contact with the term through a friend with an interest in the broader ideological movement called “neoreaction”—which some consider the manosphere to be a part of.
Writing in the manosphere is often unruly, raw, and confrontational, even downright offensive. This is not the realm of New York and London big-5 publishing, but of group blogs and self-published e-books. I hope we are beginning to move on from disdaining such work: as it was back in the mid-2000s when I was a videogames researcher, many writers with the best feel or most interesting take on the available material are doing their work outside of big-name journals, sites, newspapers, and publishing houses.
The rise of independent publishing helps the emergence of such movements and writers, giving them retail exposure without a publisher as gatekeeper and intermediary. As thriller novelist Michael MacConnell writes, there is an indentifiable left-wing bias among writers on average. It is tempting to speculate that this is entrenched by the ability of left-biased publishing-house staff to deny authors who do not share their prejudices access to the channels they control.
Ironwood’s is a self-published book, and its rawness comes in the form of several repeatedly misused words, and a range of other not-too-prevalent mistakes. I’ve come to accept this sort of thing as part of the indie publishing landscape, provided that it doesn’t compromise readability—and this is by no means unreadable or poorly written. Further rawness comes from its sources: the aforementioned blogs and e-books rather than academic journals and the canonical texts of gender politics. Ironwood also anticipates that readers of a feminist bent will take offense to the material, and makes little apology for that.
The book is less Ironwood’s own statement, though, than it is a summary of the different subcultures within the movement, the bloggers that represent them, and the ideas that they hold. Here we see MRAs and PUAs covered, as well as Christian conservatives, “old married guys” (OMGs), alpha dads, puerarchs, and “men going their own way” (MGTOW). All of these are identified as part of “red pill” culture. The term is taken from the original Matrix movie, and here signifies a willingness to accept and act on the basis of uncomfortable truths rather than the myths of a politically correct orthodoxy, which are intended to subdue you.
Such “truths,” in the manosphere, tend towards:
* ideas from evolutionary biology
* a belief that men and women are different by nature as well as nurture
* skeptical views of the claim that we live in a patriarchy, that men possess male privilege, and of claims about sexual assault incidence that hinge on a redefinition of “rape” and surveys where the researcher, not the subject, decides whether they have been victimized
* observations that women are attracted by displays and exercises of male dominance in and out of the bedroom, including the accumulation and dispersal of wealth, and the exercise of physical strength
Dismiss all this as misogyny if you like, hopefully with an awareness that the word now means “counter to feminist orthodoxy” more often than it refers to genuine hatred or denigration. That dismissal is so predictable it can be taken as given. What’s more interesting here are some of the other discoveries to be made:
* The manosphere includes gay men trying to recover their masculinity from a feminized culture.
* Lots of manosphere talk is about good health and eating, career planning, the benefits of travel, self-employment, and education, valorizing blue-collar work, and trying to stay happily married.
* “Men going their own way” are about recovering their independence not only from a culture that sees their primary value as being their ability to support women and serve their interests, but also from the institutions where they are expected to seek employment, and the consumer culture where they are expected to spend what they earn at the office or factory.
Let’s sum this up as simply as we can: the manosphere is about men being comfortable with their own gender identity and sexuality while pursuing good health, prosperity, and independence.
Given this, it’s somewhat inevitable that manospherians spend time criticizing feminism and feminists, which feminist commentators accuse them of spending too much time on. Why? Because manospherians’ view of feminism is that it means women serve their own interests while men also serve women’s interests.
I’m in broad agreement with this, and also in broad agreement with earlier strains of feminism. Health, independence, and a positive view of one’s own sexual identity are important for human wellbeing. Feminism’s claim is that women have been denied these goods, and it has sought to recover them for women.
The problem is, much contemporary gender feminism attempts to recover these goods while denying them to men—particularly the assertion of a positive sexual identity. Just one loathsome example of contemporary comment, written by a man, insists that modern men are trained to hate women. Really? I never was, and I never did.
In fact, I have since childhood been exceptionally comfortable with women and interested in them as people, and regarded them as my equals, a situation I’ve viewed as totally compatible with my interest in them as sexual partners. Precisely because of this, and the apparent necessity of mentioning it in my defence, the repeated insistence that, I and my male peers must in some way hate and fear women, be oppressing them, or be constantly enjoying a privilege that we are obliged to apologize for, has made me decreasingly sympathetic to contemporary feminism and calls for attention to women’s interests.
Magnify that for confirmed manospherians. Against a feminism that pursues specifically female interests to the exclusion and detriment of men’s interests, the manosphere’s subcultures raise their banner: “we are men pursuing our own interests and valorizing our own sexual identity.” And they will pursue those interests against the interests or claims of women if necessary.
If feminism is reasonable in calling for female self-determination, it then seems reasonable that men might attempt to do the same.
Though I don’t recall that Ironwood says this explicitly, one of the tantalizing offers that the manosphere makes to men is this:
"Men don’t have to do what women want them to do. Or, for that matter, what anyone else wants them to do."
And not only can you do what you want, but, so the red pill observation goes, you will get laid more if you do, because women are attracted to assertive men who are in control of their own lives and don’t submit excessively to external demands or goals that others have set. And not only that, but it’s fine to view getting laid more as a goal. It looks like that’s what male sexuality is about, and it’s fine to be a man.
In the manospherian view, men don’t have to:
* be feminists or feminist allies
* crusade any further for sexual equality
* wash the dishes using the exact method that their wives or girlfriends or mothers-in-law prefer to see them use when they are looking over their shoulders (yes, this happened to me—it was a mother-in-law)
* wonder if they are rapists because the willing girl who came home with them was tipsy when they went to bed, or because they hadn’t filled out a consent form, or if they are sexual assault victims because they really wanted to sleep but had sex with their insistent girlfriend instead (yep, that’s sexual assault according to some survey methodologies)
* commit to a relationship and have or support children
* pander to a culture of discourse that views emotivism, faulty logic and rhetoric, personal attacks, and unwarranted extrapolations of personal experience as a praiseworthy counterpoint to the supposed masculine use of reason as a tool of oppression
Through his survey of the manosphere’s subcultures, Ironwood repeatedly gave me this kind of lightbulb-over-the-head moment where I understood that there is actually no deep moral or rational obligation for me to be on-board with the contemporary gender-feminist project, or to make apologies for my sex, sexuality, or rationality.
This should all sound hauntingly familiar: it is a mirror of some feminist outlooks. And it should be viewed as perfectly logical and defensible that, in a world where women make these assertions, men will make them, too. If we don’t like what is in the mirror, we should also look critically at what it is reflecting. In contemporary feminist and masculinist culture, there is a lack of concern for the other, and for society at large, that some (myself included) may find disconcerting.
Similar in this regard to Neil Strauss’s The Game, Ironwood’s book is an illuminating tour of male subcultures, albeit with an identity-political bent. It will fascinate most, offend many, and empower others.
This comment has been removed by the author.ReplyDelete
This is a good note in regards of how one brings red pill thinking into polite or rambunctious conversation without fists or plates flying. I have been working on my repertoire of "soft entries" on the whole red pill thing where I can either deconstruct feminist orthodox positions that are condoned mindlessly by the general public like the wage gap fallacy.ReplyDelete
Even today my ten year old son correctly identified a double standard by which girls and boys are judged and disciplined. It was a "teachable moment" and we, both my wife and I taught him the word, hypocrisy. I assured him he would be learning a lot more about that over the next few years in respect of dealing with girls and women.
I like how the review ends with the simple idea, expressed as it is, that men simply don't need to support orthodox sexual equality, we don't have to live under the crass assumption that we are all rapists in waiting, ready to spring on a moments notice, and so on.
These pearls can be tossed out in such a way as to incite the hard core feminists to shriek but in such a way that any reasonable person may well actually ponder if traditional feminist thinking really holds much water these days.
A more subtle approach than a full frontal assault.
I would very much like to hear more about these soft approaches. And I doubt I'm the only one.Delete
i wanna thank Dr Ekpiku for what he has done for me at first i taught he was scam but until i just decided to follow my mind.i told him that my ex lover which i loved with all my heart left me for another all Dr Ekpiku did ato laugh and said he will be back to me in 3days time i taught he was lying on the 3rd day my ex called me and said he wanna see me,i was shocked then he came over to my place and started begging that he was bewitched,immediately i forgives him and now we are back and he his really madly in love with me.All thanks to Dr Ekpiku he indeed wonderful incise you wanna contact him here his is private mail Ekpikuspelltemple@live.comReplyDelete
Dịch vụ Kiem tra ten mien miễn phí từ iNETReplyDelete
Tao web mien phi trên nền tảng web tin một cách nhanh chóng, chuyên nghiệp
Chuyên trang Mẹo vặt cuộc sống cung cấp mẹo vặt hay trong cuộc sống hằng ngày
Đăng ký nhận Ten mien mien phi từ inET
Tin tức về Manchester united cập nhật hằng ngày hàng giờ
Chuyên trang về Du lịch cung cấp thông tin về các tour du lịch, kinh nghiệm đi du lịch
Dubai Escorts with Indian and Pakistani Girls in Dubai.ReplyDelete
Fresh Escort Dubai
Hot Dubai Escorts
Whatsapp/Call at: +971 564 314 254
Cute Sexy and Hot Fresh Indian and Pakistani Dubai Escorts.ReplyDelete
Fresh Dubai Escorts
LovelY Dubai Escorts
Sexy Dubai Escorts
Cute Dubai Escorts
Beautiful Dubai Escorts
VIP Dubai Escorts
Hot Dubai Escorts
Whatsapp/Call at: +971 564 314 254
There is a chance you are eligible for a complimentary $1,000 Amazon Gift Card.ReplyDelete
It was an amazing article. Realy helpful. Allow me to introduce myself. Myself Bilal. I'm a Digital Marketing Consultant in Lahore Let me know if you need any help.ReplyDelete
DHARMATALA CALL GIRLSReplyDelete
DHARMATALA CALL GIRL
Locanto Bangalore EscortsReplyDelete
Shemale Escorts in Bangalore
Sex Escorts in Bangalore
Celebrity Escorts in Bangalore
Independent Bangalore Escorts
Bangalore Escorts Services