Friday, May 31, 2013

You Know Who Hates Gamma Rabbits More Than The Manosphere? Feminists.


Back in my Blue Pill days, I went through my Gamma phase.  I'm not proud of it.  It only lasted a couple of years before I snapped out of it.  But it happened.  I can admit that now.  In fact, snapping the Gamma was one of the first steps on the road to Breaking Beta.

If you're not down with it yet, go study Vox Day's brilliant Socio-Sexual Hierarchy, listing social descriptions of all manner of men on the hunt for women.  Gammas are the "male feminists", the manboobz, the "I can be manly while I hold my wife's purse at a party while she talks to another guy" dude.  Gammas, in their evolved form, become self-loathing White Knights like Hugo Schwyzer, professional Mangina.  Essentially, Gammas have come to believe that all things male are inherently bad, and that all things female are inherently good -- sacred, even.

Typical presentations of the Gamma include low self-esteem buttressed with a "if I kiss enough female ass I'll be accepted!" attitude that can be pathological in its intensity.  Gammas are the true "Beta Orbiters".  When they do mate, it's usually with the female equivalent or lower -- except in those hilarious cases where a low-number Gamma inexplicably marries a higher-level woman.  Those things tend to be short and painful.

But this guy over at Salon is pitching a particular bitch-fit over the lustful thoughts he has about strange women, and how he feels genuinely offended on behalf of his twin daughters and his Tiger Mom, MD wife.  As he pathetically confesses the righteous indignation he feels at his own penis' mindless objectification of women (let's ignore the fact, for the moment, that a dude usually only gets in such a state when his sex life is in "IV drip mode") his tone is clearly pleading for affirmation and acceptance.

It's the Gamma Rabbit Trap: capitulate to the idea that women are superior to men, in all important ways, under the theory that such sniveling capitulation will gain you acceptance, love, and pussy.

Brother Rabbit, it don't work that way.

The Gamma Rabbits are like Black Republicans: you can't figure out how anyone would labor and advocate for a position so blatantly -- proudly! -- against their best interests.  You see, this obvious ploy of appeasement is designed to make him feel better about his "lustful, sexually objectifying" thoughts, because feminism has told him since birth that such thoughts are evil. Andy has voluntarily confessed and repented of being part of "rape culture", and fervently desires a non-sexist, non-threatening world.  A Blue Pill world, where words like "hypergamy" and "infidelity" never exist.  Where "regular sex" is timed by the moon, not by the clock.

 So . . . this guy should be crawling with feminist support and admiration, right?  Because that's clearly what he expected: affirmation for his progressive feminist views and the acceptance of him as a man because of his recognition of the inherent evils of owning a penis.

Only . . . not so much.  Poor bastard.

Not just one, but two scathing reviews of his Gamma-laden posts were made by feminists.  The thing is, they didn't take issue with his political perspective.  They took issue with . . . him.

In New York Magazine, in an article entitled, "I'm a Woman, I read Slate, I Write Violent Thoughts About A Man Who Writes About Being Horny.  How Can I Stop That?" (when, clearly, she has no desire to stop), Maureen O'Conner conflates her hatred of male sexuality and fatherhood in a screed that - if the genders were reversed - would land her in anger management counseling or fired and escorted from the building by security.  In part Ms. O'Conner's violent misandry over male feminist Andy Hinds' admission that yes, he too has a penis (although he's very ashamed to admit it) goes something like this:

". . . deep in the vaginal recesses of my female imagination, I fantasize about tearing Slate writer Andy Hinds limb from limb. "
"If I had more respect for Andy Hinds, I might indulge my fantasy about punching him in the gut so hard that he doubles over in pain for a moment. "
"Unfortunately, like Andy Hinds, I too am but a prisoner to my instincts, no matter how hypocritical or rude. The heart wants what the heart wants, and my heart wants violence. "
"Sure, I may want to throw Andy Hinds and [professional Mangina] Hugo Schwyzer into a tank full of hungry sharks, but  . . ."
This, Andy, from your feminist "allies".

Oh, but it gets worse.

From Jezebel, the Industry Leaders In Organized Misandry, in a post entitled: "Daddyblogger Controls His Boner With 'Imaginary Burqas'" by Katie Baker, which goes beyond the violent imagery above and just resorts to humiliating, shaming and effectively destroying this man for sharing his confusion about his sexuality in the feminist-approved way:

But it's not sexist to think about boning strangers, and it's horrifying, really, to resort to mentally censoring women so you don't have to consider the possibility that you're not actually as much of an "enlightened" feminist as you think but a dude with a latent Madonna-whore complex (Hinds could ask his wife how she feels about all this, at least?)

This is actually worse that O'Conner's piece, because not only does she emasculate him for self-emasculating, she further emasculates him because he doesn't have his wife's permission to think these thoughts.  And then she goes on to state that she agrees with all the violent misandrist crap in O'Conner's post.

Way to go, girls.  Another win for our side.

See, Gentlemen, when the poor Gamma Male Feminist Rabbits do try to talk about how proud and dedicated they are to non-sexist culture and gender equity, the moment they poke their head up out of their hole the feminist lawnmower rolls over it.  Andy is an almost complete Scalzi, but he's already getting hammered for his "enlightened" attitude by the very feminists he's trying to identify with.

In his own blog, he frets over the comments from the "Men's Rights Movement" and being misunderstood, not quite understanding that it wouldn't matter how clear and concise he had been, any time a "male feminist" says something out loud, he will and is always castigated roundly by a plurality of female feminists.

It's like a law of nature.  Just see how much respect professional Mangina Hugo Schwyzer has in their circles.

Andy, what you have to realize (and probably wont) is that regardless of the kicking-around you feel in the Manosphere among "Men's Rights Movement" and "Right Wing" trolls, the fact is that we're a lot more forgiving than the feminists are.  We're always willing to help a brother out, if he's willing to admit that the bullshit disguised as political theory known as "feminism" has less to do with equality as it does with female entitlement.  The ladies at Slate and NYMag feel utterly entitled to bash you and your life, your lifestyle, even your wife and kids with impunity, because they know you won't defend yourself.  Even that "What I meant to say" pieces will be ridiculed . . .  if it's even noticed.

Here's the thing, Andy: you will never be accepted as a "feminist" by feminism, because you are Male, and therefore part of the "Patriarchy" and oppressive "Rape Culture" that you, yourself, have been trained to loathe.  Fear, guilt, and early indoctrination convinced you that male sexuality was "bad", and feminism has compounded that feeling by publicly ridiculing your sexuality even as you struggle with it.  On the other side, your unwillingness to admit and embrace the fact that a) you have a penis b) there's no inherent shame in that fact and c) any group who espouses equality and then indulges in such nasty bits of misandry is so intellectually dishonest at its core that your "alliance" with them resembles more a prostitutes alliance with a pimp, not the honest and equal intellectual partnership.

Read these posts again, Andy.  Feel how much they scorn and despise you?  You are contemptible to them . . . because you propose to agree with them.  If they were truly dedicated to a non-sexist world they would have applauded your admission, not condemned it.  But they treated you like a thuggish rapist for admitting that you had illicit thoughts.

Here's the Red Pill truth, Andy: illicit thoughts about random women are part of your evolutionary heritage, and attempting to eschew that so you can make a couple of bitter feminist bloggers happy (when they are predestined not to be happy) with you is just stupid.  You really area Beta Dad, and no, I don't mean that in a "good" way.  In fact, you're less Beta and more Gamma.  A White Knight.  Just the kind of dude feminists love to throw under a bus until you howl . . . which they then point to as proof that they were right all along.

Look, I'm sure you have a spiffy marriage and your kids are adorable.  But Andy, if you don't clue into some stuff real quick, I prophesy a divorce or estrangement within a decade, and then you'll be here, bitter, and wishing you had listened to us.

First, ditch the fear of women.  As much as you love your wife and daughters, that does not extend to the millions of women that would be happy to falsely accuse you of rape, take advantage of your gender in the workplace, or yawn with boredom when they hear of your death in an industrial accident on the news.  The idea that feminists have any male's rights or issues in mind is demonstrably false.  Your continued adherence to this self-destructive, genocidal ideal is going to bite you in the ass even bigger than it has, mark my words. (Go ahead.  Mark them.  I'll wait.)

The Red Pill Truth, Andy, is that your wife earns more than you do, which means (if the stats are correct) that despite everything else, you have at least a 40% chance of divorce in the next decade if it continues.  The truth is that feminists will never accept you, they will always reject you no matter how "nice" you are, and in fact the nicer you are, the more they will despise you.  Gamma Rabbits don't fit into their program unless they need votes or someone to take out the garbage.

It kinda sucks you have daughters, because you're all awash in "girl power" feminism.  If you had sons, then you'd have a much different perspective.  One in which you would see your son's achievements and performance retarded and belittled because of his gender.  One in which your son would not matter even in the abstract to most feminists, because he's "part of the problem".

If you're smart, you'll start reading the Manosphere, Andy.  Not the PUA stuff, but the Married Man Sex Life Blog/books/forum by Athol Kay.  No More Mister Nice Guy.  And my own humble blog.  You'll discover that being Beta -- or worse, Gamma -- gets you respect from neither gender.  The only ones who love Gammas are other Gammas . . . until you stop acting like a Gamma.  Then they turn on you and devour you.

Seriously, dude.  You're a good dad, that's obvious.  You want to be a good husband.  Feminism will help you with neither of those things.  Don't believe me?  Count the number of feminists you know who have been in long (15+ years) happy marriages to the same man.  Go ahead.  I'll wait.

Didn't take long, did it?

That's the dirty little secret feminism doesn't want you to know.  Feminism is not a reproductive strategy designed with a long-term relationship, much less marriage, in mind.  In fact, it celebrates divorce and the estrangement of children from their fathers as a matter of course.  You might disparage the "MRAs" as a bunch of bitter boobs, but the chances of you being there someday, if you keep doing what you're doing, are better than hitting the Pick 6. Ever.

So Andy, I invite you to seriously reconsider your position.  In fact, just to be a good guy about it, I'm going to send you a review ecopy of the Manosphere book as an introduction.

But for the love of Zeus and Hercules, stop acting like you raped someone because you popped a boner over some babe.  It's embarrassing, harmful to your fellow men, and even your wife -- as sympathetic and empathetic as she's likely being about it right now -- isn't going to find you any more attractive because of this.  Quite the contrary.

Welcome to the Manosphere, Andy.  Learn how to Break your Beta. We can help you be a better man.  Hell, it might just save you.


18 comments:

  1. Amanjaw MarcuntteMay 31, 2013 at 1:26 PM

    It's wonderful when your enemies go cannibal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. actually liberalism has done much more to destroy black america. it is black Liberals who are voting against their self-interest. other than that good article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Left / Right divide is pure Blue Pill material. Both are funded by the same people, and both are here to distract the masses from the true alternatives. It's a puppet show for so-called adults.

      Update your political consciousness to Red Pill standards.

      Delete
  3. Oh so so true.

    I don't know if many of you heard this but there is a new show which I predict will be pushing the whole "man up" concept. It's called "Pregnant and Dating" and premired on WEtv yesterday. It revolves around 5 pregnant and dating women. My favorite takeaway from the review in the New York Daily News was the following: "Megan says conception came after a “Taco Tuesday” party and involved alcohol. Daddy would like a role in the baby’s life, right up until Megan tells him, “The baby will know who you are and that’s it.”

    Priceless. But I bet she still goes after him for child support

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In AZ, the default (at least legally on the book) is joint custody and basically equal parenting time (with or without marriage). This assume the father demands it. Sole custody should only be awarded when the other parent is incapable. I know is my own divorce, she was a stay at home mom and wanted full custody. I requested joint custody, and got it.

      The reason I bring this up is because I believe that joint custody (even of unmarried couples) will become the default through the country. I actually believe the days of fathers only being a source of funds will diminish. While they may end up paying for most of the expenses, they will enjoy the fruit of their labor by getting to have a significant role raising their children. This is the result of feminist demands for equality -- they have demanded it, and slowly the system is bringing it around. While there still are gross inequalities, the major ones are getting fixed. What I like about this is that women will end up losing much of the power they have enjoyed -- the power of the cradle.

      Delete
  4. Word.

    It took me a long time to realize that the more I tried to be a "safe" male, the more that women ascribed the evils of the world to me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What are the odds that the kids are his?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ian achieved intellectual bankruptcy with his Black Republicans comment.

    Sure, both parties have corruption (Look up which party owns ALL THE FEDERAL GOVT UNIONS before you say they are equally corrupt!), but to say they are exactly the same is simplistic idiocy.

    The people claim 'Red Pill' means realizing both parties are exactly the same? Really?

    Which states are more business friendly?

    Which cities are the ones collapsing? All those genius Black Democrats in Detroit who weren't like those stupid Black Republicans, what did they get in Detroit in return for voting for Dems for 50 years?

    Chaos. That's what they got. If you haven't spent years and years researching politics, just shut your mouth. You come across as an ignorant partisan hack, just like the others on this thread who haven't spent a lick of time researching politics deeply, but yet claim the authority to say that you're only a 'Red Pill' if you take an absurdly simplistic viewpoint.

    Grow up, then start slinging terms like 'Red Pill' around. Otherwise, you just look dumb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What an angry libertarian we have here. Hey, you're the sciencey, logic type. The red pill is about facts. So I want you to go look up which states have the lowest literacy rates, the lowest high school graduation college degree rates, and the worst poverty, and tell me what color they been voting for the past fifty years.

      Also check what color states send more tax dollars than they get from the gov't, and which states are the welfare leeches. Then come back to me.

      Delete
  7. Hey Ian, which party was trying to disarm us a couple months ago? Which party defended us?

    Sure. Eeeeexactttly the same. Except they're not.

    Ian, you're a sex nerd. Shut up about politics if you want any respect from those of us who actually know about politics.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I will stick up for Ian here - such agita over a throwaway wisecrack about "Black Republicans" in an otherwise solid piece on how feminists hate male White Knights far worse than Tucker Max PUA's! To which you whiners stab a fellow red-pill guy in the back and scream "if only those black folk were properly re-edumacated they'd know only Republicans can save them!" Which is not the point.

    In other words, you sound just like the Jezebelians and the would-be Facebook Male Shame Censorship Society. Can't take a joke. It's enough to make Lindy West laugh. Except she can't.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I stopped reading when you made the comment about black people's politics.

    I wonder, do you think that men self-harm by voting Democrat, the very party that promotes hard-core feminism and whose followers on the left turn campus and workplace into hostile places for men, with their left-wing 'all men are evil' ideology?



    ReplyDelete
  10. "The heart wants what the heart wants, and my heart wants violence"

    "Sure, I may want to throw Andy Hinds and Hugo Schwyzer into a tank full of hungry sharks, but..."


    Ironically, this is just the start of Maureen O’Connor’s delusional insanity. She seems to "heart" dick even more than violence.

    Not that I support the supine drivel of Andy Hinds (and...ugh...God knows, NOT Hugo Schwyzer), but her faux outrage over his sexism seems bizarrely out of place. This is a woman who came to prominence a few years ago outing Chris Lee's wayward penis on Gawker, but now it’s become an obsession.

    According to their own blog tags (under penises), SHE HAS WRITTEN MORE POSTS ON SCHLONGS OF EVERY DESCRIPTION IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS ON THE CUT THAN ALL OTHER NYMAG BLOGGERS COMBINED IN THE LAST 3 YEARS AND THERE ARE 7 OTHER BLOGS. It's more than her leitmotif, it's her Weltanschauung. Her obsession with John Hamm's member alone is borderline cyberstalking. Sibling dick, Weiner dick, Flaccid dick, she just can't seem to leave them alone.

    Does she think that's just a tad hypocritical in, you know, a '90's era John Goodman critiquing the excessive weight of actresses sort of way? Of course not. An ageing sorority queen obsessing about the male member is just healthy. You might feel that John Hamm would be more entitled to violent fantasies of her in a shark tank than her vision of Hinds and Schwyzer (not that I would object; Hell, I'd feed Hugo piece by piece myself), but that would be your irreducible patriarchy talking.

    Biblical metaphors of motes in eyes whilst ignoring the Giant Redwood growing out of her own come to mind (she’d take that to be another dick metaphor), but it’s of no use. The hamster wants what the hamster wants, and Maureen wants to obsess about dick whilst projecting screeching outrage at hopeless boobzy Andy Hinds for even thinking about teh wimminz bits.

    I know rad-fems like to accuse guys of "lookism", but she can't seem to look at anything else.


    http://nymag.com/tags/penises/

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/03/jon-hamms-penis-so-big-it-requires-photoshop.html

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/03/jon-hamm-lay-off-my-penis.html

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/04/study-women-like-big-flaccid-penises.html

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/04/why-didnt-huma-recognize-weiners-dick-pic.html

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/05/confirmed-brothers-penis-sizes-can-differ.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. This post just reminds me of why I dislike Vox's hierarchy. It is needlessly complicated because Vox himself has overcomplicated things by serving two masters: he would like to be alpha and religious Catholic at the same time when the two don't perfectly overlap.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I would even take it a step further, it really even isn't about race. Anyone that lacks the intellect, drive, or ambition to ever have a household income over around an inflation adujusted $25K should probably never vote for a Republican since they will inevitably benefit from the Socialist redistribution that Democrats so freely promote... Not to mention that more lax prison sentences when they sometimes go on to commit crimes on top of never becoming a fully self-supporting member of society... But if you have visions of yourself achieving financial success, or even wealth someday then the decision to vote for present day Democrats becomes a perilious one...

    ReplyDelete
  13. I read the source article as satire, was that the wrong approach?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dubai Escorts with Indian and Pakistani Girls in Dubai.
    Dubai Escorts
    Dubai Escort
    LovelyEscorts Dubai
    Fresh Escort Dubai
    Hot Dubai Escorts
    Whatsapp/Call at: +971 564 314 254

    ReplyDelete